Table of contents:
- What is the difference between the new film adaptation from the Soviet "Gloomy River"
- A film novel instead of a film story
- Two Anfisa
- Filming difficulties
Video: New film adaptation of "Gloomy River": Why Julia Peresild was afraid of the reaction of Lyudmila Chursina
2024 Author: Richard Flannagan | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-15 23:55
On March 9, the screening of Yuri Moroz's 16-episode series "Gloomy River", a new screen version of the novel of the same name by Vyacheslav Shishkov, started showing, and from the very first episodes the project caused a wide response. Comparisons with the Soviet film of 1968 are inevitable, and the opinions of critics and viewers were divided: some call the new version more complete and dynamic, while others are disappointed with the selection of actors. The project participants themselves did not stay away from the discussions: the performer of the role of Anfisa Yulia Peresild was afraid of how Lyudmila Chursina, who played the same role, would perceive her work, and her reaction was not long in coming.
What is the difference between the new film adaptation from the Soviet "Gloomy River"
The four-part television film "Gloomy River" directed by Yaropolk Lapshin was at one time very popular with viewers and has long become a recognized classic of Soviet cinema. Professor-culturologist, film critic N. Kirillova wrote about this film: "".
Directors who create remakes of everyone's favorite Soviet films always run the risk of becoming an object of devastating criticism, because new versions, as a rule, cannot be compared with recognized classics, and any modernization of an old plot usually looks ridiculous. However, judging by the ratings and resonance among the audience, it became clear from the first episodes that the new "Gloomy River" certainly cannot be called a failure and unsuccessful. Although it is still far from the end of the screening, in the first week there were dozens of reviews and reviews of this film. The opinions of critics and viewers were divided, but already by their number it is clear: Yuri Moroz's project has become an event in the film world.
First of all, it should be noted that, in essence, Yuri Moroz's film is not a remake of Yaropolk Lapshin's "Gloomy River", because in the first film version of the novel only some plot lines were used, and the 2020 series was the first full screen version of Shishkov's work. The director also made no attempts to modernize the plot or transfer it to new realities. Critics write that Moroz translated this material into the language of today due to the dynamism of the plot, the rapid rhythm of the narrative and the shift in emphasis from the class struggle, which was at the center of the Soviet film, to the love line and personal relationships of the heroes. In addition, the beauty of Siberia's nature was lost on the black-and-white film of the Soviet film, and in the new series it seems to become the main character of the story.
A film novel instead of a film story
The project was produced by Konstantin Ernst and Evgeny Evstigneev. The latter said: "".
Director Yuri Moroz has already given several interviews, in which he explained his idea: the Soviet version was more of a movie story, and the new one became a movie novel - 16 episodes instead of 4. Several plot lines of the novel were expanded and added to make the motivation of the characters' actions clearer. The director is sure that the majority of young viewers have not seen the 1968 film, and the new film adaptation will be their first acquaintance with Shishkov's novel.
According to Moroz, this work does not lose its relevance today and can be read in a new way: "".
Two Anfisa
In any new version of old films, the selection of actors traditionally evokes a flurry of criticism - if only because the audience fell in love with Soviet film characters, and it is already very difficult to imagine any other actors in the same images. Especially in those cases when the film work became one hundred percent hitting the target - as in the case of Anfisa Lyudmila Chursina.
In addition to the obvious visual appeal, her heroine has what is called the word "sweetness". Her beauty is fatal, her inner strength is crushing, and the depth in her gaze is bottomless. It is simply impossible to “replay” the actress in this image, but Yulia Peresild did not set herself such a task.
Of course, Julia Peresild was the first to come under the spotlight of critics and viewers. The actress understood the full degree of responsibility and was afraid of the reaction of the audience, but first of all - of her predecessor, Lyudmila Chursina. The 79-year-old actress watched the first episodes and immediately commented on them: "".
Julia Peresild breathed a sigh of relief when she heard the flattering review of one of the best Soviet actresses, whom she considers great without exaggeration, and admitted that it was her opinion that was very important to her. Those viewers who drew parallels with the Soviet film were disappointed with the choice of the actress for this role, but there is no need to compare, because Peresild created a completely different picture of the role - her Anfisa is more eccentric, brave, daring and desperate.
Filming difficulties
Director Yuri Moroz said that he would not read reviews and comments until at least 12 episodes out of 16 were released, because they began to write after the first 4 episodes, although it will be possible to add up a full picture of the new film adaptation only in the final. The only thing that can be judged right now is that the project has become one of the most difficult in its implementation over the past few years. During the year of filming, the film crew made 7 expeditions and changed 3 difficult locations related to traveling along the river, where the actors had to cross the rapids on the Iset River in the Urals by boat.
In reality, the Gloom River does not exist - its prototype for the writer was the lower tributary of the Yenisei, the Lower Tunguska. The filming of the series by Yuri Moroz took place in several locations: in the Urals, in the vicinity of Yekaterinburg, in Minsk, Kineshma, Suzdal and in the Moscow region. The most difficult were the expeditions to Siberia - the filming took place in hard-to-reach places, 100-150 km away from settlements. The director explained this by the fact that he wanted to capture the real nature, so that the audience would believe in the authenticity of what was happening.
Another drama series could be shot about the life of the actors who starred in the Soviet film adaptation: How did the fate of the stars of "Gloom River".
Recommended:
Why was the star of the film "Spring on Zarechnaya Street" afraid to marry: Gennady Yukhtin's later happiness:
In the filmography of this actor, there are almost 180 works in films, but the main roles can be counted on one hand. The audience remembered and fell in love with Gennady Yukhtin immediately, when pictures with his participation began to appear. But he himself calls the film "Spring on Zarechnaya Street" the main thing in his fate; it was after it that popular love fell upon the actor. He had many fans, but the actor for a long time avoided even thinking about starting a family. Subsequently, he admits that he was simply afraid
Why did Stalin appreciate the tyrant general Apanasenko, or Why the Japanese were afraid of him
Shortly before the start of the Great Patriotic War, Joseph Apanasenko became the commander of the Far Eastern Front. According to the recollections of colleagues, there was nothing pleasant about the new boss. At first glance, everything in him repulsed: a rough, uncouth appearance and the glory of an uneducated tyrant. The general swore loudly and hoarsely, choosing no expression either for the rank and file or for the higher leadership. Apanasenko's subordinates could only guess why the swearing man enjoyed the location of Stalin himself and why
Why in Russia they were afraid of blacksmiths, why did the stove-makers leave bottles in the masonry and other ancient secrets of the professions?
In Russia, representatives of some professions were treated in two ways. They were respected and feared at the same time. We are talking about stove-makers, millers and blacksmiths. This happened because our ancestors believed that these people possessed special knowledge, were in collusion with the other world. Read in the material about millers who sacrifice people, about blacksmiths who communicated with evil forces and about stove-makers who could call devils into the house
Hamlet will become a woman in the new adaptation of Shakespeare
In the new film adaptation of the tragedy of William Shakespeare, Hamlet will be turned into a woman. It is reported by the Daedline edition. The main role in the film directed by Ali Abbasi will be played by actress Noomi Rapace, known for such projects as "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo", "Sherlock Holmes: A Play of Shadows" and "Prometheus"
Don't be afraid of the knife, be afraid of laughter: funny posters for the martial arts school
Judging by the funny ads, the martial arts school teaches special street magic. How else to explain the fact that the formidable weapons of the bandits are turning into funny and ridiculous devices. Hits of the season: a foam bat, brass knuckles from a cord and a knitted knife with a pink fur handle - will be among your opponents if you train in a martial arts school, hints a creative ad