Table of contents:
- Labor revolution
- What was the "continuous"
- Fair popular discontent
- Still, the fight against opium for the people?
- The legacy of a continuous week
Video: Why the Soviet Union did not have a weekend for 11 years
2024 Author: Richard Flannagan | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-15 23:55
For Soviet proletarians, until the fall of 1929, Sunday was a day off. It was a reward for six working days. You could be with your family, go to church, or clean up after all. But in the eyes of the Soviet government, headed by Comrade Stalin, Sunday posed a threat to industrial progress. The machines were idle, productivity dropped to zero, and people got used to bourgeois comfort. This was contrary to the ideals of the revolution and a continuous working week was introduced. Why, then, an experiment so successful in theory failed in practice?
Labor revolution
September 29, 1929 was the last Sunday, which was a day off. On the following Sunday, such a collective pause did not happen. By the decree of the government of the Soviet Union, 80% of the workers were sent to the machine. Only 20% remained at home. For all working people, the practice of a continuous work process or a seven-day working week began. Rest days were now scattered throughout the week. Such a schedule was proposed by the Soviet economist and politician Yuri Larin. Machines should never be idle.
The interruption was meant to revolutionize the concept of work, increase productivity, and make religious worship too troublesome. Everything looked great in theory, but in practice the project failed on almost every count. Some changes have been made to it. In 1931, the cycle was extended to six days. In the end, after 11 years of trial and error, the project was scrapped in June 1940. The labor revolution did not work out.
What was the "continuous"
Unlike a normal seven-day week, a continuous week began as a five-day cycle. Each of his days was marked with a specific color and symbol on the calendar. The population was divided into groups, each of which had its own day to rest. Days of the week, so familiar and familiar, gradually lost all meaning.
Instead of a name, each of the five new days was marked with a symbolic, politically relevant subject. These were: a sheaf of wheat, a red star, a hammer and sickle, a book and a budenovka. The calendars of those times show days marked with colored circles. These circles indicated when to work, when to rest. It was the biggest shift schedule in human history.
Fair popular discontent
From the very beginning, things didn't go the way they wanted. The working class was terribly dissatisfied with the innovation. Proletarians wrote letters to newspapers, to various party organizations that such a schedule nullifies the whole meaning of the day off. People were indignant: “What should we do at home if our wives are at the factory, children at school, friends and relatives at work? This is not a day off if you need to spend the whole day alone at home. The workers not only could not rest normally, it was impossible even to just get together with their families.
All this destroyed any economic bonuses of such a system. A dissatisfied person cannot work fully with full dedication. The social sphere and culture also began to suffer. Inability to gather the whole family, complication of the practice of religious worship. Holidays have completely disappeared from the life of workers. Instead, the illusion of intense work was born. There are reports of family problems caused by a continuous week. In those years, it became common to mark your friends and acquaintances in address books with a certain color depending on when they had a day off.
Sociologist and author of The Seven-Day Circle: The History and Significance of the Week, Eviatar Zerubawel, argues that calendar reform may be related to traditional Marxist aversion to the family. Making the family units of society less integrated and cohesive may even have been a conscious part of the agenda. In the absence of technology, says Zerubawel, temporal symmetry is the glue that holds society together. There was no general leisure here. Without him, it was easier for the Soviet state to divide and rule.
It is more likely that the nonstop was trying to attack another area of the life of Soviet workers. Religious. If the Soviet government was really concerned only with economic losses, it would have been enough to simply introduce a seven-day period. With the introduced experimental schedule, there were more days off per year than before. Maybe the target of this attack was Sunday, as a traditional day for going to church?
In the end, the workers' complaints were taken into account. To make it easier for families to communicate and spend time together, another reform was carried out. In March 1930, the government issued a decree establishing general days off for members of the same family.
Still, the fight against opium for the people?
The theory argued that a continuous week would make religious worship nearly impossible. Without Friday, Saturday or Sunday, Muslims, Jews and Christians could not attend services. This was considered the winning result of the Soviet government's two-year campaign against religion.
Therefore, innovations that could break the influence of religion on the minds of people were greeted with enthusiasm. At first glance, it may seem ridiculous that creating such inconveniences can eradicate faith in God in people. But the party functionaries thought it was possible. Moreover, no one had ever tried anything like this before, so no one knew how it worked. The idea failed, like everything else. No restrictions could affect people's faith. Although many stopped going to church on Sundays, it was not possible to completely eradicate religion.
Among other things, outside the big cities, entire groups of the population were left outside the scope of the calendar reform. The continuous week hardly touched them. In rural areas, collective farmers were engaged in planting and harvesting, caring for livestock, and this is in no way influenced by the days of the week. Far from the country's bureaucratic urban centers, agrarian life continued in much the same way as before. True, many collective and state farms have made it a rule to cancel both new secular public holidays and traditional days of worship. Officials complained that the peasants were still influenced by traditional habits.
The legacy of a continuous week
It is difficult to pinpoint the full impact of a continuous week on society. After all, this was only part of a huge cultural and political upheaval brought about by Soviet industrialization. The reform widened the gap between the city and the countryside. After all, life in the villages proceeded in a completely different rhythm and obeyed different laws. Around this time, internal passports were introduced to control rural migration. The peasants tried to escape from the terrible conditions and move to the city. Something similar exists today in Moscow in order to limit the number of people who want to settle in the capital.
Eleven years of life in the Soviet Union passed under the sign of chaos. The calendars of the period were confusing and strange. Public transport worked on a five-day cycle, many businesses six days, the stubborn rural population traditionally seven days a week. In the end, the reform ultimately failed. Labor productivity fell to historic lows. Continuous use led to rapid wear of working machines. As early as 1931, it became clear that so-called shared responsibilities often meant that no one took responsibility for their work tasks. It is clear how detrimental this is to work in general.
June 26, 1940, Wednesday, the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet announced the restoration of the seven-day cycle. Sunday has become a day off again. The attitude to the work process, the working ideology, so to speak, remained unchanged. For ordinary workers, dismissal from work, absenteeism or being late for more than 20 minutes was punishable by criminal liability. The punishment could be a very real prison term.
For a rather short, by world standards of states, history, the Soviet Union had a lot of achievements. One of the most important is the flight of the first man into space. Read our article declassified archival documents of the first flight of Yuri Gagarin into space: what the authorities were hiding for many years.
Recommended:
Rogvolodovich, not Rurikovich: Why Prince Yaroslav the Wise did not love the Slavs and did not spare his brothers
In the official historiography, Yaroslav the Wise for a long time appeared to be an almost sinless ruler, the creator of legality in the Russian lands. In our time, he is already accused of sending several of his brothers to the next world in order to occupy the Kiev throne. But was it only the desire for power that drove Prince Yaroslav? If you look at the history of his family, then everything that happens is more like revenge … to his father. Bloody revenge for bloody atrocity
Why did the Germans want to kidnap Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill, and why they did not succeed
The plan to kidnap the leaders of the "Big Three" states could be called an adventure, if not for the punctuality and scale with which the Germans were preparing for the operation. One thing the German leaders did not take into account before the "Long Leap" - the activity and awareness of Soviet intelligence, the coherence and scale of their secret, but effective work. Thanks to the timely detention of SS saboteurs and the arrests of German agents, the USSR special services managed to disrupt the operation already at the first stage it was completed
Why did Catherine II want to legalize polygamy in Russia, and why she did not succeed
The contribution of Catherine II to the cultural development of Russia is quite large. The Empress was fond of literature, collected masterpieces of painting and corresponded with French enlighteners. This woman was incredibly energetic, and directed her energies to governing the country. Thanks to her, polygamy was almost introduced in Russia. Read in the material for what reasons the ruler wanted to legitimize this and why her attempt failed
She did not promote the Germans, did not ruin Russia, did not leave the course of Peter: what is Anna Ioannovna accused of in vain?
Anna Ioannovna, niece of Peter the Great, went down in history with a terrible image. For what they just did not reproach the second ruling queen of Russia: for tyranny and ignorance, craving for luxury, indifference to state affairs and for the fact that the dominance of the Germans was in power. Anna Ioannovna had a lot of bad character, but the myth about her as an unsuccessful ruler who gave Russia to be torn apart by foreigners is very far from the real historical picture
Unfulfilled dreams of Alexei Buldakov: Why the main general of cinema did not become a pilot and did not play Beethoven
For 37 years of his film career, Alexey Buldakov managed to play more than 120 roles. However, for fans, he will forever remain the main general of our cinema. The artist, who was "popular" both by official status and, most importantly, by the real attitude of the audience towards him, passed away, having recently celebrated his 68th birthday. In this review, I would like to recall how the creative career began and how the personal life of the actor developed, who created the cinematic image of the beloved Mikhalych