Table of contents:

Did dragons, basilisks, unicorns, and other animals mentioned in the Bible actually exist?
Did dragons, basilisks, unicorns, and other animals mentioned in the Bible actually exist?

Video: Did dragons, basilisks, unicorns, and other animals mentioned in the Bible actually exist?

Video: Did dragons, basilisks, unicorns, and other animals mentioned in the Bible actually exist?
Video: 78-year-old man feels 50 after clocking up 520,000km cycling around the world | ABC Australia - YouTube 2024, November
Anonim
Image
Image

Unicorns, basilisks, dragons - those with whom Harry Potter was friends or fought, those mythical, fabulous creatures that are mentioned in the legends of different nations, deserve close attention and study - because at least some of them appear in no less Holy Scripture. Does this mean that they existed in reality, and then disappeared for some unknown reason? Or is there another explanation?

Basilisks and dragons

Basilisk on the coat of arms of the House of Visconti
Basilisk on the coat of arms of the House of Visconti

That's right: in the biblical texts, this seemingly mythical snake, capable of killing with a glance (as an option, also with poison and smell), really appears. The basilisk is discussed in Psalm 90 (“you will step on the asp and the basilisk; you will trample the lion and the dragon” - 1.13), in the Book of Isaiah, in Deuteronomy. In biblical texts, the basilisk is a rather unpleasant creature, associated primarily with dangers and troubles. It is mentioned along with the asp, so if the basilisk existed in reality, it would probably have to be attributed to the family of asps, poisonous snakes, to which the cobra also belongs.

The snake in many cultures is a special character in mythology, its true name is taboo, hence, perhaps, the appearance of a number of snake-like characters
The snake in many cultures is a special character in mythology, its true name is taboo, hence, perhaps, the appearance of a number of snake-like characters

Greek mythology tells about the basilisk: this snake, small in length, is supposed to have arisen from a drop of blood of the slain Gorgon Medusa, which also had miraculous powers in the sense of sight. Following the Greeks, the Romans also believed in the existence of the basilisk, and the Egyptians believed that this snake, in addition to everything, was immortal. The myth happily survived the Middle Ages, supplementing the stories about the basilisk: it allegedly hatches from an egg laid by a rooster. Among the Slavs, by the way, the basilisk itself looks like a rooster - with dragon wings, tiger claws, a lizard's tail and an eagle's beak, covered with black scales, with a red crown on its head.

The crown here is not accidental, the very name "basilisk" is derived from the Greek "king". This, by the way, made it possible to propose candidates from the real animal world who could become a prototype for this biblical snake. One of them is a horned viper, on the head of which there are growths that vaguely resemble a crown.

Antichrist on Leviathan
Antichrist on Leviathan

Of the close-minded "relatives" of the basilisk mentioned in the Bible, it is worth mentioning the dragon - almost three dozen times his name is found in the Holy Scriptures. The dragon is also a serpent, it personifies evil, deceit, destruction. In general, a serpent, a basilisk, a dragon - all this is quite close to a concept that is not directly mentioned in the Bible: it is "one who cannot be called" in the guise of a reptile, which is reproduced in modern literature by the English writer.

Of the same "breed" of biblical animals - Leviathan, which is referred to in the Book of Job, the Book of Psalms and the Book of Isaiah, as a sea monster and a "bending serpent". By the way, Leviathan, according to the Old Testament texts, is a being without a pair, since its presence would create an even greater danger for humanity and for the world.

Unicorns and hippos

Unicorn on the mosaic of a church in Ravenna
Unicorn on the mosaic of a church in Ravenna

Another animal that is paradoxically mentioned in the pages of biblical texts is the unicorn. In the Scriptures, it is referred to as a real-life beast, however, the description of the unicorn is not given there. For modern man, as, indeed, for many generations of his ancestors, a unicorn is a horse, usually white, with a long horn on its forehead. The biblical texts report about the unicorn only in the context of his actions, or the actions of a person in relation to him. ("Will the unicorn want to serve you and sleep at your manger?" - Job, 39). The unicorn chose to leave Eden with Adam and Eve, although he had the opportunity to stay in the Garden of Eden. Something similar happened to another animal, which, however, is not mythical for the Russian-speaking reader. This is a hippopotamus, first mentioned in the Bible.

Leviathan was portrayed as the ruler of the water element, the hippopotamus was portrayed as a land beast, and the mythical bird Ziz allegedly ruled in the air
Leviathan was portrayed as the ruler of the water element, the hippopotamus was portrayed as a land beast, and the mythical bird Ziz allegedly ruled in the air

Generally speaking, it is not known who exactly was discussed in the book of Job - again, this is just the name of the “beast,” an animal, without any positive or negative connotation. The one who all over the world bears the name of hippopotamus, “river horse” from Greek, is also called hippopotamus in Russian, in other languages this word refers only to the biblical text and does not have the usual meaning.

Did they exist or not?

Why does the Bible mention mythical animals?
Why does the Bible mention mythical animals?

How did it happen that the text, which is considered the main one in the history of mankind, contains indications of the same animals that appear in children's fairy tales and fantasy novels and whose real existence is not supported by any evidence? Or are medieval authors right - considering all these creatures once existed in reality?

The Bible really mentions a multitude of animals - no wonder that in the several thousand years that have passed after the creation of the Old and New Testaments, the fauna of the Earth has undergone changes and some of the species of animals, reptiles, birds have become extinct, remaining unknown to modern man. And yet, the real reason that unicorns, basilisks and others got into sacred texts is different. Most of the Bible texts are known in translation made into Greek in the 3rd - 1st centuries. BC. ("Septuagint") and in Latin in the IV-V centuries. ("Vulgate"). There, in translations, one can find those initial mentions of mythical animals, which later turned out to be in subsequent translations, already from Greek and Latin.

G. Dore. Destruction of the leviathan
G. Dore. Destruction of the leviathan

Perhaps, when reading texts in Hebrew, the authors of the translations associated what was written with those animals that they knew about from their own cultural experience, and given that in ancient Greece they quite confidently told stories about Medusa and a basilisk, they considered not only horses with a horn in the middle of their foreheads to really exist, but also flying, and even with a human torso, the choice of the wording seems more understandable. In addition, in cases where, for artistic reasons, it was required to describe an animal not just terrible, but terrible, not just dangerous, but personifying all the evil of the world, it was not enough to mention, for example, a crocodile - no, a dragon or a leviathan was required.

Jan Bruegel, P. P. Rubens. Paradise (fragment)
Jan Bruegel, P. P. Rubens. Paradise (fragment)

In later translations, Bible texts often no longer contained references to "mythical" fauna. The unicorn disappeared, instead of it we began to talk about the "bison", and the "hippopotamus" was replaced by the "beast". Symbols and allegories did not disappear - they were simply brought into conformity with the new well-known ideas about the world around us. The text, once recorded through the prism of ancient mythology and the Middle Ages, has undergone changes, which is not surprising.

Continuing the theme of mythical animals, the story of where did the myth of the unicorn come from, and why the mysterious animal turned pink.

Recommended: