Table of contents:
Video: Why Gerald Durrell valued animals more than people, and did not hide it
2024 Author: Richard Flannagan | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-15 23:55
The British naturalist and animal rights activist is known as the founder of the Jersey Zoo and the creator of the Wildlife Conservation Fund. He led more than 15 major expeditions, wrote about 40 books, won several significant awards in literature and zoology, and several species and subspecies of animals are named in his honor. During his expeditions, he communicated with the inhabitants of those areas where he happened to be. But people, unlike animals, did not evoke ardent love in him.
Animal lover
Gerald Durrell became the fifth and youngest child of Louise Florence Dixie and Lawrence Samuel Durrell. He was born in India and visited the zoo in early childhood. Later, the naturalist will say that it was the first visit to the zoo that awakened his love for animals, which he retained until the end of his days.
On the Greek island of Corfu, where the family moved when Gerald was 10 years old, he began collecting his first animals. It is to the representatives of the fauna that he will devote his whole life, giving them most of his time and energy.
The elder brother of the naturalist, the writer Lawrence Durrell, considered Gerald a little out of this world. He was frightened by the constant expeditions of his brother, and sometimes he even believed that Providence had deprived Gerald of his mind, for a normal person cannot constantly "jump in the jungle", where snakes are teeming and much more dangerous creatures are found.
However, the zoologist himself considered people much more dangerous than animals. It was from the representatives of the "kings of nature" that any trick could be expected. And the natives in his mind could be of only two types: "cannibals" and "not cannibals."
Incredible stories
Even as a child, Gerald learned the simple truth that the indigenous peoples categorically do not tolerate any manifestations of familiarity and familiarity from white people. He never succeeded in making friends with the natives, and the zoologist's relationship with them was based on the only intelligible language, commodity-money. True, sometimes not entirely censorship expressions or even threats were added to them.
Even in his youth, Darrell visited Cameroon, where he was looking for hairy frogs. He set up his own camp with the whole group on the territory belonging to the natives. It was this tribe that preferred to live in isolation, without coming into contact with their fellow citizens. Its leaders decided not to let any foreign culture into the territory, preferring to preserve their own identity.
For the first time Darrell heard about this tribe from other, more civilized natives. And the very next day I saw traces of their stay a little away from the animal path.
There were a lot of bones and even some kind of matted hair next to the coals from the fire. Gerald knew from the reaction of his entourage that he had better leave this place as soon as possible. Moreover, they themselves looked with horror at the site of the recent camp of an unknown tribe and seemed even petrified with fear. It was clear: a tribe of cannibals stopped here and the remains of an unfortunate eaten man were scattered around the fire.
It was still some time before Gerald Durrell heard in the local market the story of a rather brutal prank arranged by the natives to a white traveler, in which the carcass of a dead crocodile was planted in his tent, which could very well be taken for a living. Moreover, a part of the blanket, which the crocodile did not have time to eat, hung from the animal's mouth in a very naturalistic way. The servants of the white traveler, rushing to the master's cries for help, bravely “fought” with the toothy monster, staging a whole performance for the “master”.
They screamed, fought the monster, dragged him into the bushes, and then pretended to kill a crocodile. In gratitude for the "salvation" the traveler gave his native guides a very generous monetary compensation.
It was only then that Gerald Durrell realized how masterly the terrifying scene was played out in front of him with the place of rest of the tribe of cannibals. At the same time, the natives took revenge on the white master for the moral damage that the "civilized man" inflicted on the local population with his inflated superiority and haughty harsh treatment.
Perhaps they wanted to take revenge on Darrell for his dislike and rather harsh treatment. Until the end of his life as a naturalist in 1995, he still loved animals more than people. According to the scientist, animals are always straightforward and honest, unlike humans. Animals never pretend to be intelligent, invent nerve gases, and have no pretensions. In general, they are much more worthy of love than people.
Many from childhood love books by Gerald Durrell, dedicated to his childhood and adolescence, such as "My Family and Other Animals" or "Halibut Fillet". The Darrells appear in them as a kind, but very friendly and loving family, which is wisely led by the best mother in the world. In fact, of course, Gerald described his childhood more biased than accurate. The troubled Durrell family was far from ideal, and the mother's ways of raising children could provide either geniuses or criminals. In general, it turned out both.
Recommended:
Rogvolodovich, not Rurikovich: Why Prince Yaroslav the Wise did not love the Slavs and did not spare his brothers
In the official historiography, Yaroslav the Wise for a long time appeared to be an almost sinless ruler, the creator of legality in the Russian lands. In our time, he is already accused of sending several of his brothers to the next world in order to occupy the Kiev throne. But was it only the desire for power that drove Prince Yaroslav? If you look at the history of his family, then everything that happens is more like revenge … to his father. Bloody revenge for bloody atrocity
Why did the Germans want to kidnap Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill, and why they did not succeed
The plan to kidnap the leaders of the "Big Three" states could be called an adventure, if not for the punctuality and scale with which the Germans were preparing for the operation. One thing the German leaders did not take into account before the "Long Leap" - the activity and awareness of Soviet intelligence, the coherence and scale of their secret, but effective work. Thanks to the timely detention of SS saboteurs and the arrests of German agents, the USSR special services managed to disrupt the operation already at the first stage it was completed
She did not promote the Germans, did not ruin Russia, did not leave the course of Peter: what is Anna Ioannovna accused of in vain?
Anna Ioannovna, niece of Peter the Great, went down in history with a terrible image. For what they just did not reproach the second ruling queen of Russia: for tyranny and ignorance, craving for luxury, indifference to state affairs and for the fact that the dominance of the Germans was in power. Anna Ioannovna had a lot of bad character, but the myth about her as an unsuccessful ruler who gave Russia to be torn apart by foreigners is very far from the real historical picture
Unfulfilled dreams of Alexei Buldakov: Why the main general of cinema did not become a pilot and did not play Beethoven
For 37 years of his film career, Alexey Buldakov managed to play more than 120 roles. However, for fans, he will forever remain the main general of our cinema. The artist, who was "popular" both by official status and, most importantly, by the real attitude of the audience towards him, passed away, having recently celebrated his 68th birthday. In this review, I would like to recall how the creative career began and how the personal life of the actor developed, who created the cinematic image of the beloved Mikhalych
Photo project "Animalia": animals are not people, and people are not animals
Imagine an empty, empty city where there is not a single person. Empty houses, workplaces and public places, empty streets and parks. There is not a single human soul. No life. Rather, there is no human life, but there is an animal